Release Time: 2025-11-25 17:00
Source: State Administration for Market Regulation
November 25 in the morning, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) held a special press conference on food safety titled “Conducting Full-Chain Sampling Inspection and Strengthening Full-Chain Supervision.” The following is the full transcript of the press conference:
Wang Qiuping, Director-General of the Department of News and Publicity of SAMR:
Ladies and gentlemen, friends from the media, good morning! Welcome to the SAMR press conference on food safety.
Food safety concerns the vital interests of the people, and food safety sampling inspection is an important means to ensure food safety and implement food safety supervision. To help everyone better understand the key tasks of food safety sampling inspection in 2025, today we have invited Mr. Sun Huichuan, Chief Food Safety Supervisor of SAMR; Mr. Wei Guofeng, Director-General of the Department of Food Sampling Inspection; Mr. Sun Fajun, Deputy Director-General and Level-1 Inspector of the Department of Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Regulation of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs; Mr. Luo Jun, Deputy Director-General of the Import and Export Food Safety Bureau of the General Administration of Customs; and Mr. Liu Yumin, Party Leadership Group Member and Deputy Director-General of the Shaanxi Provincial Administration for Market Regulation, to brief us and answer questions of public interest.
First, let’s invite Mr. Sun Huichuan to introduce the overall situation of food safety sampling inspection since the beginning of this year.
Sun Huichuan, Chief Food Safety Supervisor of SAMR:
Friends from the media, good morning! Thank you very much for your long-standing strong support for our food safety regulatory work! Below, I will give a brief overview of the work related to food safety sampling inspection.
Food safety sampling inspection is a statutory system established by the Food Safety Law of the People’s Republic of China, and it is also a statutory duty conferred upon market regulation authorities by the same law. It is an important technical means for identifying food safety problems and detecting food safety risks. It serves as the “radar” and “locator” of food safety supervision, providing precise targeting for full-chain food safety regulation. For the general public, food safety sampling inspection results are also an important reference for their sense of safety and satisfaction in daily life.
Let me begin by reporting a set of the latest data—As of mid-November this year, the national market regulation system has completed 5.7026 million batches of food safety sampling inspections, detecting 156,000 batches of non-compliant samples, with a non-compliance rate of 2.74%. It has also completed 234,400 batches of risk monitoring, detecting 10,200 batches of problematic samples, with a risk detection rate of 4.36%. The problems identified mainly involve excessive pesticide residues, misuse of food additives, and microbiological contamination.
In recent years, market regulation authorities have adhered to the principle of regulation for the people, focused on meeting the public’s demand for a high-quality life, and centered on full-chain food safety supervision. Guided by rule-of-law thinking, problem orientation, and scientific attitude, we have planned and advanced food safety sampling inspection work. Our main efforts fall into four major areas.
First, following the principle of comprehensive coverage, we aim to make food safety sampling inspection more convincing.
Across the supply chain, food safety sampling inspection has already covered all types of entities and business formats involved in food production and operation. In the production stage, we “focus on both big and small,” ensuring coverage of all operating food manufacturers while increasing sampling inspections for small processing workshops. In the operation stage, we “pursue completeness without omissions,” covering all types of retail entities such as supermarkets, convenience stores, agricultural wholesale markets, as well as all types of food service operators including restaurants, central kitchens, and school cafeterias. It also includes new business formats such as food delivery, livestream e-commerce, fresh food e-commerce, and imported food.
In terms of food categories, sampling inspection already covers 39 major categories, including edible agricultural products such as vegetables, fruits, livestock and poultry meat, as well as processed food such as rice, flour, and edible oil, and food served in catering establishments. It is fair to say that almost all types of foods the public can purchase or consume in daily life have been included in the scope of sampling inspection.
In terms of testing items, sampling inspection covers 2,066 indicators specified in food safety standards, including pesticides, veterinary drugs, microbiological hazards, and food additives. Each indicator is supported by scientific testing methods and limit requirements.
In terms of workforce coordination, SAMR collaborates with the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, the National Health Commission, the General Administration of Customs, the National Food and Strategic Reserves Administration, and others. We also increase coordination of sampling tasks for local market regulation authorities, effectively establishing a full-chain food safety sampling inspection system.
Second, with problem detection as the goal, we aim to make food safety sampling inspection more forward-looking.
We focus on “what children eat,” achieving 100% coverage of all operating infant formula producers and conducting “monthly inspections” of infant formula products, sampling all operating producers every month to ensure the safety of Chinese babies’ staple food. We organize provincial market regulation authorities to conduct “biweekly inspections” of school meals and centralized procurement platforms for school food ingredients, requiring full coverage of all school cafeterias nationwide—primary, secondary, and university—within a two-year cycle, ensuring children eat well and parents feel assured.
We target “problem-prone items” as inspection priorities. This includes key issues being addressed this year, such as school food safety, counterfeit and substandard food in rural areas, the production and sale of fake and inferior meat products, misuse of food additives, and edible vegetable oil. We also increase sampling volumes for food categories and testing items with historically high non-compliance rates. For enterprises with detected non-compliance, we conduct follow-up sampling. For issues highlighted in complaints, reports, and public opinion, we strengthen risk assessment and conduct targeted special inspections.
We take “uncertain issues” as focal points by establishing a “Blue Team” for sampling inspection. Focusing on urgent public concerns, we enhance the precision of sampling and improve our ability to detect risks. We carry out special sampling inspections targeting livestream e-commerce, fresh food e-commerce, and food delivery. For issues of high public concern—such as adulteration and counterfeiting—we intensify risk monitoring.
Third, guided by scientific and technological innovation, we aim to make food safety sampling inspection more precise.
We adapt to new issues in food safety regulation, organize scientific research projects, and strive to solve the problems of “undetectable, inaccurate detection, and slow detection.” Facing technical difficulties in detecting adulterants of public concern, we developed and published 106 supplementary food testing methods capable of detecting nearly 1,000 substances, covering key categories such as grain products, meat products, soy products, and seasonings. These technologies significantly reduce the room for illegal activities.
To address risks associated with potential non-edible substances in food, we included sildenafil-type and ractopamine-type substances in the List of Non-Edible Substances Potentially Added to Food and issued supporting testing methods. Since the release of the list, many cases of illegal addition of non-edible substances have been uncovered nationwide, forming strong deterrence.
To meet the needs for rapid screening of edible agricultural products, we issued 67 rapid testing methods, enabling “quick screening” in key locations such as farmers’ markets and school cafeterias and greatly improving problem detection efficiency.
We have also worked with the National Health Commission and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs to issue 1,725 national standards, continuously improving the full-chain standard system “from farm to table.”
Here, I would like to highlight several food safety issues that have drawn widespread public attention in recent years, with strong public reactions. For example, adulteration of meat and meat products with other animal-derived ingredients—some products labeled as mutton rolls are actually mixed with duck meat; or adulteration of edible vegetable oil with other oils—some products labeled as extra virgin olive oil are actually blended with soybean oil or corn oil. To fully resolve these issues, breakthroughs in testing technology are essential. However, globally, no country has yet developed a mature and effective quantitative testing solution.
To address this, market regulation authorities adopted a “challenge-based” mechanism, mobilizing top research resources across society to conduct scientific and technological research. We have so far received nearly 100 project submissions, with promising prospects for breakthroughs in detection technology. We will announce any new progress to the public in a timely manner.
Fourth, guided by the principle of addressing both symptoms and root causes, we aim to make food safety sampling inspection more impactful.
On one hand, we have further strengthened the investigation and handling of non-compliant food. During the 14th Five-Year Plan period, a total of 1.07 million non-compliant food cases were investigated and handled nationwide, with fines and confiscations totaling about 4.3 billion yuan, and over 13,000 cases transferred to public security authorities. We have strengthened notifications and supervision, ensuring effectiveness in risk control, cause investigation, rectification, administrative penalties, and information disclosure. Since the 14th Five-Year Plan began, the number of enterprises with multiple batches of non-compliant food has dropped significantly—down nearly 50% in 2024 compared with 2020, and down another 57.47% year-on-year in the first three quarters of this year.
On the other hand, we have increased technical assistance. We have guided local authorities to establish expert technical teams and provided assistance to 11,525 food enterprises. By addressing individual problems, preventing categories of risks, and standardizing entire industries, we actively promote high-quality development of the food industry.
That concludes my brief introduction. Thank you!
Wang Qiuping, Director-General of the Department of News and Publicity of SAMR:
Thank you, Mr. Sun Huichuan, for your introduction. Next, let’s invite Mr. Wei Guofeng to brief us on typical cases of non-compliant and problematic food detected in sampling inspections and their follow-up handling across the national market regulation system this year.
Director Wei Guofeng of the Food Sampling and Testing Department of the State Administration for Market Regulation: Since the beginning of this year, market regulation authorities have strictly implemented the “four strictest” requirements. For issues such as adulteration, illegal addition of non-edible substances, and multiple batches failing inspections found during sampling inspections, authorities have strictly investigated and handled them in accordance with the law. More than 170,000 cases related to food safety sampling inspection investigations have been processed, with fines and confiscations totaling about 420 million yuan, and over 900 cases transferred to judicial authorities. Today, we are reporting five typical cases to the public.
-
Case of adulterated edible oil produced by Chongqing Wudingfang Food Co., Ltd.
Sampling inspection by market regulation authorities found abnormal fatty acid composition in the pure sesame oil produced by Chongqing Wudingfang Food Co., Ltd. The main illegal activities identified include:
First, adding cheap soybean oil and cottonseed oil into products labeled as pure sesame oil.
Second, adding flavoring agents to edible blended vegetable oil in violation of regulations; the label did not truthfully indicate the proportion of ingredients, nor did it specify that the soybean oil used was derived from genetically modified sources.
Third, adding flavoring agents to spiced seasoning oil without listing them in the ingredient list, and failing to truthfully indicate the pressing process.
Local market regulation authorities revoked the company’s food production license in accordance with the law, and imposed fines and confiscations totaling more than 20 million yuan; the responsible manager, Long, was banned from the industry for five years and fined more than 50,000 yuan. -
Case of illegal addition of non-edible substances by Tianyi Food Processing Factory in Jiangxia District, Wuhan
Sampling inspection revealed that perilla paste produced by Tianyi Food Processing Factory in Jiangxia District, Wuhan, contained papaverine, morphine, codeine, narcotine, and other substances. Investigation found that the company deliberately added these non-edible substances to enhance the flavor of the perilla paste.
Local authorities revoked the company’s food production license and transferred suspected criminal evidence to public security authorities for criminal prosecution. The court convicted the person in charge, Shi Mouzhi, of producing and selling toxic and harmful foods, sentencing her to one year and two months in prison and imposing a fine of 15,000 yuan. Local authorities also plan to impose a lifetime industry ban on her. -
Case of adulterated donkey meat sold by “Shizai Minjian Donkey Meat Huoshao Shop” in Yanzhou District, Jining City
Sampling inspection found horse-derived and pork-derived components in donkey meat sold by the shop. Investigation showed that the operator, Shen Moufei, repeatedly purchased lower-priced horse meat and pork, processed and packaged them as donkey meat, and sold them for profit. The amount involved was about 470,000 yuan.
Local authorities revoked the shop’s food business license and transferred the suspected criminal case to public security authorities. The operator, Shen Moufei, received a lifetime industry ban. The court convicted him of producing and selling counterfeit products, sentencing him to four years in prison and imposing a fine of 300,000 yuan. -
Case of multiple batches of unqualified food produced by Fuzhou Chengpinshe Food Co., Ltd.
Sampling inspection found that multiple batches of pastries produced by Fuzhou Cangshan District Chengpinshe Food Co., Ltd. failed to meet standards for acid value, peroxide value, and food additives. Local authorities imposed administrative penalties totaling more than 180,000 yuan and ultimately revoked the company’s food production license.
Afterward, authorities again received unqualified inspection reports for products produced by the company before its license was revoked. Since the company’s legal entity still existed, authorities imposed an additional penalty: confiscating 1,560 yuan of illegal gains and a fine of 50,000 yuan. -
Case of food containing non-edible substances sold by Shaohua Snack Shop in Lin’an, Hangzhou
Through big-data online monitoring and sales tracing, authorities found that the shop repeatedly purchased borax online, suggesting possible illegal use. Authorities sampled all foods likely to contain borax and detected high levels of boric acid in small wontons. Investigation confirmed that the shop repeatedly purchased borax online and illegally added it to wonton wrappers; sales amounted to over 200,000 yuan.
Authorities transferred the suspected criminal case to public security. The court convicted the shop’s responsible person, Lin Moujing, of producing and selling toxic and harmful food, sentencing him to five years and six months in prison and imposing a fine of 250,000 yuan. Another responsible person, Lin Mouhua, was sentenced to two years and three months in prison and fined 50,000 yuan. Local authorities plan to impose lifetime industry bans on both individuals.
These five typical cases of food sampling inspection investigation and handling expose that some producers and operators lack legal awareness and fail to fulfill their primary responsibility for food safety. We must resolutely implement the strictest punishment requirements, urge enterprises to strengthen food safety awareness, fulfill their responsibilities, improve risk-control measures, maintain a high-pressure regulatory environment, and strictly crack down on illegal activities. Suspected crimes must be transferred to public security authorities in accordance with the law, ensuring that violators pay a heavy price.
These cases once again warn all food producers and operators to strictly follow laws and regulations. Any disregard for laws will result in severe punishment. We also call on all sectors of society to participate in supervision and report illegal activities, jointly safeguarding the “safety on the tip of the tongue” of the people.
Director Wang Qiuping, News and Publicity Department of the State Administration for Market Regulation: Thank you, Mr. Wei Guofeng, for the briefing. Now we move to the Q&A session. Before asking your question, please state your news organization. Please raise your hands to ask questions.
Reporter from People’s Daily: The Fourth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee emphasized strengthening full-chain supervision of food safety. Could you please introduce what efforts have been made this year regarding full-chain food safety risk early warning and prevention?
Sun Huichuan, Chief Food Safety Supervisor of the State Administration for Market Regulation: The Fourth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee clearly stated the need to strengthen full-chain supervision of food and drug safety. This has pointed out the direction and provided fundamental guidance for our food safety efforts. In March this year, the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council issued the Opinions on Further Strengthening Full-Chain Supervision of Food Safety, which lays out specific arrangements for related work.
The State Administration for Market Regulation has always followed the requirements of the “four strictest” and regards strengthening food safety sampling inspection and risk early warning and prevention as an important approach to implementing full-chain supervision. We have continuously improved the risk early warning mechanism to ensure early detection, early warning, and early response to risks, focusing on the following three areas of work:
First, strengthening division of responsibilities and collaboration, weaving a tight risk prevention network, and promoting full-chain risk investigation. Under the overall coordination of the State Council Food Safety Office, various departments have worked together, giving full play to the “radar” function of food safety sampling inspection to accurately identify food safety risks. The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs conducts routine monitoring of edible agricultural products, the General Administration of Customs conducts entry inspections and monitoring of imported foods, and the State Administration for Market Regulation carries out sampling inspections of various foods sold in the domestic market. We have continued to increase sampling efforts for key products such as staple foods, edible agricultural products, school canteen foods, and online food products that are widely consumed and highly concerned by the public. Since the beginning of this year, over 60,000 batches of non-compliant foods have been detected, and investigation and handling have been carried out, effectively safeguarding the “safety on the tip of the tongue” of the people.
Second, improving the consultation mechanism, ensuring smooth information communication channels, and promoting full-chain risk prevention. Each quarter, the State Council Food Safety Office organizes cross-departmental food safety risk consultation meetings and establishes an interdepartmental information notification mechanism for sampling inspections. Since the beginning of this year, the State Administration for Market Regulation has notified the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of 110 batches of non-compliant edible agricultural products to support source governance; notified the General Administration of Customs of 55 batches of non-compliant imported foods to strengthen border control; notified the Ministry of Education of issues related to school canteen food safety to reinforce school responsibilities; and notified the National Health Commission regarding risk monitoring to support standard-setting. Meanwhile, departments such as the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, the National Health Commission, and the General Administration of Customs also regularly notify the State Administration for Market Regulation of relevant monitoring information, achieving complementary information sharing and strengthening regulatory synergy.
Third, deepening joint rectification efforts, establishing a coordinated enforcement mechanism, and enhancing full-chain coordination effectiveness. In response to prominent risks and issues identified through sampling inspections, the State Administration for Market Regulation has worked with relevant departments to carry out targeted governance. Since the beginning of this year, we have jointly conducted special rectification actions with the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, focusing on agricultural products with higher non-compliance rates, strengthening governance from both production and market ends. Together with six departments, we launched a comprehensive governance campaign to address food additive misuse and deployed special sampling inspections to improve targeted enforcement. We also established an interdepartmental law-enforcement coordination mechanism to thoroughly investigate and trace the sources of violations identified in sampling inspections, strengthening the connection between administrative enforcement and criminal justice.
Next, we will further implement the spirit of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee, continuously improve the food safety sampling inspection early warning and prevention mechanism, strengthen interdepartmental coordination and collaboration, build a solid full-chain food safety defense line, and make every effort to safeguard the dietary safety of the people. Thank you!
Reporter from Farmers Daily: China conducts routine monitoring of agricultural product quality and safety every year. How is this monitoring conducted? And how are the inspection results applied?
Sun Fajun, Deputy Director-General and First-Class Inspector, Department of Agricultural Product Quality and Safety Supervision, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs: The quality and safety of agricultural products concern the lives and health of the people. To ensure agricultural product safety at the source, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs organizes specialized national-level institutions to conduct quarterly monitoring of key regions and key agricultural products. For each monitoring activity, two prefecture-level cities are randomly selected in each province for each product category, and each prefecture covers 3–4 counties (or districts). Sampling covers production bases, farms, slaughterhouses, as well as storage facilities at the place of origin, transportation vehicles, wholesale markets, and farmers’ markets to ensure the representativeness of samples across different entities. Monitoring varieties are coordinated between national and provincial levels: the national level focuses on major products, while local authorities prioritize specialty products, achieving synergy while maintaining focus. Commonly consumed fruits, vegetables, tea, meat, eggs, milk, fish, shrimp, and crabs are all included in the monitoring scope. To ensure the effectiveness of monitoring, each year we develop a risk monitoring plan based on departmental notifications, public concerns, and actual agricultural practices, dynamically adjusting monitoring varieties and parameters.
Routine monitoring results are important indicators for evaluating the national quality and safety level of agricultural products and are widely followed by society. We adhere to a factual and problem-oriented approach in applying the monitoring results. First, we conduct consultations. Each quarter, we organize industry departments (crop production, livestock, aquaculture, agricultural reclamation) and experts from the national modern agricultural industry technology system, agricultural extension, inspection and testing, and risk assessment to conduct consultation meetings, assess potential risks, analyze root causes, propose countermeasures, and promote synergy between production and regulation. Second, we issue timely notifications. Monitoring results are released to the public at the earliest opportunity. Following the principle of “immediate reporting and immediate transfer,” non-compliant sample information is promptly forwarded to local agricultural departments for action, requiring enforcement to ensure non-compliant products do not reach the market. We also notify the National Health Commission, the General Administration of Customs, the State Administration for Market Regulation, and other departments to support risk communication. Third, we conduct interviews and reminders. Following the “Three Letters and One Notice” mechanism of the State Council Food Safety Commission, we carry out targeted interviews and reminders for regions and product categories with prominent issues, applying pressure and enforcing local responsibilities. Fourth, we guide production. Based on pesticide and veterinary drug residue monitoring results, we guide growers and breeders in scientific medication use and standardized production to ensure agricultural product quality and safety at the source.
Reporter from China News Service: The cross-border food supply chain entering China is long, with complex sources of risk, and countries have different standards and regulations, along with diverse producers and operators. Given this situation, how does Customs currently ensure effective supervision of imported food?
Luo Jun, Deputy Director-General of the Department of Import and Export Food Safety, General Administration of Customs: Good morning to all media friends! I’m very pleased to introduce the work of Customs on imported food safety supervision. Food safety concerns people’s health and lives. Customs resolutely implements General Secretary Xi Jinping’s important instructions on the “four strictest” requirements for food safety, carries out the “National Gate Protection” action for imported food, strengthens food safety supervision at the border, actively explores collaborative regulatory mechanisms with other departments, and has established a full-chain regulatory system featuring strict control at the source, strict inspection at the border, and strict handling afterwards.
First, focusing on the overseas source stage. Food is produced, and food safety must also be controlled from the source. Customs conducts risk assessments on the first import of animal- and plant-derived foods entering China in accordance with laws and regulations. Through 100% registration of overseas production enterprises of imported food and 100% official recommendation and registration for high-risk imported foods, we continuously reinforce the regulatory responsibilities of overseas authorities and enterprises. At present, the registration management system covers all overseas food producers exporting to China—94,000 enterprises across 178 countries (regions). China has granted quarantine access to 1,901 types (batches) of high-quality agricultural and food products from 135 countries (regions).
Second, ensuring strict border inspection. Customs is advancing smart Customs construction and the “Smart Customs, Strong Nation” initiative, applying intelligent inspection technologies and equipment, strengthening the team of imported food safety inspectors, and optimizing supervision sampling and risk monitoring systems. This enables more efficient smart regulation, more targeted risk monitoring, more scientific sampling, and a more complete regulatory framework. From January to October 2025, Customs conducted supervision sampling of 97,793 imported agricultural and food product samples involving 690,000 test items, risk monitoring of 5,163 samples involving 17,854 items, and ordered the return or destruction of 7,138 batches of non-compliant agricultural and food products.
Third, strengthening post-import supervision. The imported food supply chain is long, involving “cross-stage, cross-regional, and cross-departmental” regulation. Customs has strengthened collaborative supervision with departments such as the market regulation authorities and established a joint prevention and control mechanism for imported food risks. We have enhanced information sharing and intensified actions against violations. From January to October this year, Customs investigated 86 cases involving irregular operations related to imported food, with a case value of 2.65 billion yuan; and 745 smuggling cases involving food, with a case value of 8.17 billion yuan.
The Fourth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee clearly called for “strengthening full-chain supervision of food and drug safety,” outlining the direction of establishing a closed-loop prevention and control system. Going forward, Customs will continue to build a clear-responsibility, full-chain, tightly connected regulatory and accountability system for imported food safety, working with all sectors of society to jointly create a safe, trustworthy, and convenient consumption environment for imported food.
Reporter from Jiemian News: In recent years, the market regulation authorities have launched the “You choose, we inspect — Services benefiting people’s livelihood” program, which has been widely welcomed by the public. We understand that Shaanxi Province has many unique practices in this initiative. Could you please introduce these specific measures?
Liu Yumin, Deputy Director-General of Shaanxi Provincial Market Supervision Administration: In recent years, the Shaanxi Provincial Market Supervision Administration has aimed at “serving people’s livelihood and benefiting the public,” striving to enhance the effectiveness, standardization, and influence of the “You choose, we inspect” initiative. Our specific practices highlight “three integrations and three focuses.”
Regarding the “three integrations”:
First, integrating “You choose, we inspect” with the mass-line approach. We actively carry out activities in rural areas, communities, markets, and campuses to truly meet the needs of the people.
Second, integrating the initiative with improving administrative conduct. By inviting NPC deputies, CPPCC members, media representatives, and consumer representatives to participate on-site, we strengthen social oversight.
Third, integrating the initiative with the promotion of traditional Chinese culture. We select popular food districts with cultural heritage and conduct publicity using engaging formats such as kuaiban (rhythmic storytelling), northern Shaanxi storytelling, and short stage performances in Tang-style or Han-style costumes to enhance public food safety awareness.
Regarding the “three focuses”:
First, focusing on key risks. We highlight key periods, key areas, key groups, and key product categories, organizing theme activities covering breakfast and night-market foods, foods around schools, foods in elderly care institutions, and online foods, working to prevent and resolve the food safety issues that the public cares about most.
Second, focusing on industry upgrading. Local specialty foods and small-workshop foods beloved by the people of Shaanxi are included in the program. We extensively collect public opinions and provide technical support to small businesses whose products fail inspection, helping them meet safety standards and supporting the high-quality development of Shaanxi’s specialty food industry.
Third, focusing on rural revitalization. Activities themed around geographical-indication foods and visits to folk villages have been well received by local governments and the public.
So far, more than 500,000 people have participated in our online opinion-collection activities. Market regulation authorities at the provincial, municipal, and county levels have conducted more than 55,000 batches of sampling inspections based on public input. Our online promotional series for “You choose, we inspect” was recognized by the Shaanxi Provincial Cyberspace Administration as an “Outstanding Public-Benefit Online Project.” Next, we will continue to explore and innovate, further deepening and strengthening the initiative and building a sound pattern of social co-governance.
Wang Qiuping, Director of the Publicity Department of the State Administration for Market Regulation: This concludes today’s Q&A session. Thank you to all the speakers and reporters for your participation. If you have further questions, please contact the Publicity Department after the session. This concludes today’s press conference. Thank you!
Reference
https://www.samr.gov.cn/xw/xwfbt/art/2025/art_efa76f714cae4f88934700ae03ec3303.html